Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, XMGR/UIDE, ROM-DOS

Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, XMGR/UIDE, ROM-DOS
Re: Re: DEFRAG -- Udo Kuhnt	Post Reply	Top of the thread	Forum

Posted by: lucho

03/03/2009, 08:09:56

That isn't any better than XMGR/UIDE 2009 which don't support FreeDOS and ROM-DOS (removed the required options/modes). But Jack is considered the bad guy, whereas Imre Leber is the good one. Why is FreeDOS raised in such a cult? Just because of its glorified licence, THE HOLY GPL, not because of its value. This is religion and ideology, not programming. Licence is ALL THAT MATTERS, NOTHING ELSE!!!

Post Reply

Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread

Followups

Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, XMGR/UIDE, ROM-DOS --- cm ( 03/03/2009, 13:47:17 ) ( 366 bytes ) +2
- Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, EDR-DOS --- lucho ( 03/03/2009, 14:08:16 ) ( 421 bytes ) +2
  - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, EDR-DOS --- cm ( 03/03/2009, 15:36:31 ) ( 257 bytes ) +1
    - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, EDR-DOS --- Udo Kuhnt ( 03/03/2009, 18:14:19 ) ( 200 bytes )
  - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, EDR-DOS --- Imre ( 06/18/2009, 19:52:18 ) ( 274 bytes )
- Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, XMGR/UIDE, ROM-DOS --- Udo Kuhnt ( 03/03/2009, 18:11:02 ) ( 1007 bytes ) +1
  - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, MS-DOS --- cm ( 03/03/2009, 22:04:19 ) ( 837 bytes ) +1
    - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, MS-DOS --- Udo Kuhnt ( 03/04/2009, 01:15:38 ) ( 261 bytes ) +1
      - Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, MS-DOS --changed title so forum allowed posting-- --- cm ( 03/04/2009, 13:56:46 ) ( 376 bytes ) +1
        
        Re: DEFRAG, FreeDOS, MS-DOS --changed title so forum allowed posting-- --- usotsuki ( 12/19/2009, 17:47:08 ) ( 230 bytes )

The DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project